recent illegal search and seizure cases 2022

68. OF NCT OF DELHI). NDPS Act | Non-Compliance Of Section 41 No Ground For Granting Bail, Rigours Of Section 37 Still Have To Be Met : Delhi High Court. Rigours Of Section 37 NDPS Act Not Applicable In Cases Where Collection Of Contraband Sample Itself Faulty: Delhi High Court, Title: LAXMAN THAKUR v. STATE (GOVT. ", 48. The Bench of Justice Deepak Kumar Agarwal further observed that the NDPS Act does not contain any bar regarding the grant of interim custody as contained in Section 52C of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioner was found to be in illegal possession of 16 kgs of Ganja that he was apprehended by the police and the contraband was seized from his possession. 18 and 25 of NDPS Act. 21. Also Read: Bombay High Court Directs Grant Of Rs 2 Lakh Compensation To Nigerian National Jailed For 2 Years Due To Mistake In FSL Report, 13. Search and Seizure Latest Search New York Troopers' Union Offices Searched by State Police Investigators A union lawyer said the search was part of an inquiry focused on "uncovering past. 61. Punjab and Haryana High Court while dealing with a case registered under Section 18 of NDPS Act, held that the crime motorcycle impounded or seized should be released on superdari to the petitioner. 79. LiveLaw reported almost 7,000 orders and judgments in 2022 from various High Courts across the country. 2023 Cable News Network. 17. 74. A division bench of Justices MS Sonak and Bharat Deshpande held that the blotter paper facilitates LSD's consumption as a whole. The Bench of Justice Krishan Pahal denied bail to the two Accused [Chhotey Lal and Kavinder Kumar] booked under. Power To Grant Regular Bail U/S 439 CrPC Is Subject To Conditions Laid Down In S.37 NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reiterates, Case Title: Harjeet Lal @ Laddu Vs. State of Punjab. Conditions Imposed During Interim Bail U/S 439(1) Cannot Be Construed To Mean "In Custody" While Reckoning Period For Default Bail : J&K&L High Court. After careful scrutiny of section 37 of the NDPS Act 1985 we find that the exercise of power to grant bail is not only subject to the limitations contained in section 439 Cr.P.C, but is also subject to the limitations placed by section 37 which commences with non-obstante clause", the Court underscored further. It contemplates substantial probable causes for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence. The Delhi High Court has granted bail to a man incarcerated for almost 8 years in connection with a case registered under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, on account of inordinate delay in his trial and prolonged judicial custody. ", 10. 58. The Delhi High Court has said that the question whether non-compliance of Section 41 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in the process of arrest, search and seizure vitiates the trial is to be seen at the stage of trial and cannot have any bearing on grant of bail. Commercial Quantity in relation to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances is defined under Section 2(viia) of the Act. Defense Attorney David Fischer successfully convinced Judge Kara K. Ueda in his motion to suppress the search and seizure because the stop itself for "illegal" tinted windows" was not legal and the subsequent search was not lawful because of the illegal stop and because the "pat search" was not lawful. She declined, and left to spend the night in a hotel. Railway Police Force Constables Not Independent Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To NDPS Act Accused, Case title - Aditya Kumar v. Union Of India Through Narcotic Control Bureau, Lucknow [CRIMINAL MISC. S.42 NDPS Act | Gazetted Police Officer Can Cause Lawful Search Of Enclosed Spaces 'Whether By Day Or Night': P&H High Court, Case Title: Navjot Singh @ Jota Versus State Of Punjab. 23. The Delhi High Court has observed that the object of default bail is inherently linked to Article 21 of the Constitution of India, laying emphasis on safeguarding the life and personal liberty of the accused against arbitrary detention. The Division Bench comprising Justices Debangsu Basak and Md. 50. A division bench comprising of Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice Amit Sharma was dealing with a plea wherein three questions were referred to it by a single judge bench concerning the issue pertaining to miniscule percentage of a narcotic substance under the Act. Holding the drug to be a "controlled substance", Justice Bhatnagar held that the bar of Section 37 is not applicable in this case. The investigation against him was complete and chargesheet was also filed before the Sessions Court. The Karnataka High Court has held that an accused charged under the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS) Act does not get aright to default bail under Section 167(2) of CrPC, merely because the chargesheet/ final report filed by the Police after investigation is without FSL report. The right to a fair trial is fundamental to the rule of law. recent illegal search and seizure cases 2022kentucky probate forms inventory. Briefly, the facts of the case are that an application was filed seeking release of an accused under the NDPS Act on regular bail till final disposal of the case registered by the CBI. [NDPS Act] Call Conversations B/W Co-Accused Sans Transcript Not Corroborative Material In Absence Of Substantive Evidence: PH High Court, Case title - Vikrant Singh v. State of Punjab and connected matters, The Punjab and Haryana High Court has observed that without the transcript of the conversations exchanged between the co-accused, mere call details would not be considered to be corroborative material in absence of substantive material found against the accused in a case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 66. ", 34. NDPS Act | Accused's Refusal To Get A Search Conducted Under Section 50 Would Be Vitiated If He Misunderstands Questions Put To Him: Delhi HC, Title: STATE v. DENIS JAUREGUL MENDIZABAL. A Single Judge Bench of Justice Sashikanta Mishra relied upon Iswar Tiwari v. State of Odisha, 2020 (80) OCR 289, wherein the legal position as regards the provisions under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C read with Section 36(A)(4) of the NDPS Act, was elaborately discussed by the Orissa High Court and it was held that the notice must mandatorily be issued to the accused and he must be produced before the Court whenever such an application is taken up and that where any such report occurs the question of it being contested does not arise and a right accrues in favour of the accused. If there are clear warning signs of criminal activity, then an officer could perform a search even if the person declines to give permission. It also appears that neither such procedure is followed", 36. The Delhi High Court on Friday observed that if the contraband seized falls within the provisions of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, the weight of the neutral substance would not be ignored while determining the nature of the quantity seized, whether small quantity, commercial quantity or in between. Gazetted Officer Who Is Part Of Raid Is Not 'Independent', Personal Search Conducted By Him Does Not Constitute Compliance Of S.50 NDPS Act: Calcutta HC, Case Title: Ali Hossain Sk. 65. Delhi High Court Clarifies Controlled Substances Are Not Affected By The Bar To Bail Under Section 37 Of The NDPS Act, Case Name: TINIMO EFERE WOWO Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI. by . 35. The Delhi High Court has observed that while granting bail under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, a Court must have "reasonable grounds" to believe prima facie innocence of the accused and that the accused will not commit a similar offense while on bail. The Karnataka High Court while rejecting a bail application by an accused charged under provisions of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act (NDPS) has reiterated that merely because the chemical analysis report of the contraband seized is not received within 15 days, it is not a ground to release the accused on bail. 2,52,15,350 was found. "Above all the charge-sheet, prima-facie, does not suggest that temple from which ganja was recovered, was in his exclusive possession of the applicant. 16.6 lakh was seized. 26. - 42918 of 2021]. The Delhi High Court has granted bail to an accused in an NDPS case, observing that 'Khad' cannot be solely interpreted to mean drugs or contraband. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma made the observation while dismissing a revision petition filed by an accused in relation to a case registered under Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, challenging the order of Trial Court wherein his plea for Default Bail was dismissed. After the filing of complaint and chargesheet, the witnesses were examined however certain panchas and witnesses turned hostile and supported the case of the prosecution.Subsequently, the trial court after perusing the evidence on record acquitted the accused. [NDPS Act] Investigating Officer's Request For Extension Of Time Not Substitute For Report Of Public Prosecutor: Madras High Court Reiterates, Case Title: Shakil Ahamed v The Superintendent of Customs. 84. Justice SH Vora observed that though the senior citizen was not at the scene of offence or in the nearby vicinity, however, since he was the property owner, Section 25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is attracted to the case. P. C read with Section 36A(4) of the NDPS Act", Justice Sanjay Dhar explained. S. 37 NDPS Act | Regular Bail For Possession Of 'Ganja' Can Be Granted If It Is Not Of Commercial Quantity: Andhra Pradesh High Court, Case Title: BIKKA PARVATHI Versus STATE REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. BAIL APPLICATION No. The Bench comprising Justice SH Vora and Justice Sandeep Bhatt said, "IO while acting on prior information and before making search of a person, it is imperative for him to inform the respondent-accused about his right to sub-section (1) of Section 50 of the NDPSAct for being taken to the nearest Gazetted Officer or the Magistrate for making search in their presence. Since the case was instituted under the NDPS Act, the court also recorded satisfaction regarding twin conditions for bail under Section 37 of the Act. No Default Bail If Statutory Period To Complete Investigation Extended U/S 36A(4) NDPS Act Before Expiry Of 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC, Case Title : M. Mohanraj Versus The State Of Andhra Pradesh. Jewel v. NSA. S. 37 NDPS Act| 'Reasonable Grounds' Mean Something More Than 'Prima Facie' Grounds: Calcutta High Court, Case Title: Manik Das @Manik Chandra Das v. The Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB). The remarks were made while granting bail to an accused under the Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, languishing in jail for more than four years. Draconian Provisions Of NDPS Act Misused: Calcutta High Court Orders Mandatory Videography Of Recovery Procedure, Case Title: In the matter of : Kalu Sk. 78. Thus, restrictions under Section 37 of the Act would apply. The court passed the order on a reference by a single judge on whether LSD alone or the combined weight of LSD and blotting paper would be used to determine the weight the seized drug. The Gujarat High Court has affirmed the acquittal of anaccused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, on theground that she was merely accompanying her husband and had no knowledge ofcontraband being carried in the bag. In that decision, the judge wrote that Mr. Hill failed to file written post-hearing submissions. The High Court set aside the orders passed by a Sessions-cum-Special Court which granted extension to submit chargesheet without providing hearing to accused and not even releasing him when he was entitled for 'default bail'. Did you encounter any technical issues? 81. 51. 30. Emphasing that fair, just and reasonable procedure is implicit in Article 21 and it creates a right in the accused to be tried speedily, the Court observed: "This Court has consistently observed that while Courts must remain cognizant of the deleterious impact of drugs on society, it is also important to keep in mind that deprivation of personal liberty without the assurance of speedy trial contravenes the principles enshrined in our Constitution. "Further Incarceration Would Be Violative Of Article 21": PH High Court Grants Bail To NDPS Accused In Jail For Over 2.5 Yrs, Case title - Sandeep Singh @ Sonu v. State of Punjab [CRM-M-34488-2022 (O&M)]. NDPS Act | Passing Secret Tip About Illicit Drugs To Gazetted Officer Before Apprehending Accused Not Reason To Doubt Prosecution Story: P&H High Court, Case Title: Jaswinder Singh @ Jass VERSUS State of Punjab. Mere Operation Of S.37 NDPS Act Does Not Disentitle Accused To Bail, Relief Should Be Granted If Reasonable Grounds Exist: JKL High Court Reiterates. The Kerala High Court has reiterated that the request of an investigating officer seeking extension of statutory 180 days period is not a substitute for the report of public prosecutor as envisaged under Section 36A of the NDPS Act. The Andhra Pradesh High Court granted bail to a person accused of illegal possession of 16 kgs of Ganja. Bhang Not Covered Under NDPS Act, Prosecution Must Show It Is Prepared From Charas/ Ganja: Karnataka High Court, Case Title: ROSHAN KUMAR MISHRA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, Case No: CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6611 OF 2022. Justice Subramonium Prasad observed that there was an "egregious violation of an accused's right to personal liberty and right to speedy trial" as, in the off-chance that the Petitioner is acquitted, it would entail an irretrievable loss of eight years of his life that cannot be compensated. NDPS Act | Possession Not Proved Merely By Sitting In Vehicle From Which Contraband Is Seized: Orissa High Court, Case Title: Kishore Bira v. State of Odisha. Dorm rooms While college students do NDPS Act | ChargesheetWithout FSL Report Not Defective, No Ground For Default Bail U/S 167(2) CrPC: Karnataka High Court, Case Title: Sayyad Mohammad @ Nasim V State Of Karnataka Case No: Writ Petition No.5934 Of 2022. Justice A. Badharudeen observed, "a mere re-production of the application or request of the Investigating Officer by the Public Prosecutor in his report, without demonstration of the application of his mind and record of his own satisfaction would not render his report as the one envisaged under Section 36-A(4) of the Act. @ Kuran v. State. v. State of Kerala. I have reasonable ground to believe that he is not guilty of the offence," said Justice Jasmeet Singh in the order dated October 3. 72. 46. Punjab and Haryana High Court while dealing with a regular bail plea in an FIR registered under the provisions of NDPS Act, held that the provisions of Section 42 of the Act, are applicable to search of buildings, conveyance, and, enclosed space, upon receipt of prior information by the investigating officer concerned when searches, are conducted in the interregnum inter-se sunset, and, sunrise. A Single Judge Bench of Justice Bibhu Prasad Routray held, "It is the settled law that right guaranteed under Section 167(2) to the accused is indefeasible. The Tripura High Court has made it clear that Section 63 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 does not bar the owner of a vehicle seized in raid to make an application seeking interim custody/ bail of his vehicle after expiry of thirty days from the date of seizure. The Supreme Court in the 2009 ruling had said "these provisions should be taken as a discretionary measure which should check the misuse of the Act rather than providing an escape to the hardened drug peddlers.". Justice Sanjay Dwivedi was essentially dealing with the bail applications moved by the Applicants accused U/S 8/20, 25, 27(a)/28 R/W Section 29 NDPS Act. Singh was found in possession of two polybags containing black colour material, later found to be "afeem". The single judge bench comprising Justice Jasmeet Singh noted that denial of bail without any possibility of the trial concluding anytime soon would cause an infringement of the accused person's right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. 41. Being familiar with these common college search scenarios might inform students how to respond in similar situations. Right Of Accused U/S 50 Of NDPS Act To Be Searched In Presence Of Magistrate Violated: Gujarat High Court Upholds Order Of Acquittal, Case Title: State Of Gujarat v. Ugamsinh Dhanrajsinh. It provides dual conditions for bail in case of certain offences: one, prima facie opinion of the innocence of the accused and two, the accused will not commit a similar offense while on bail. 2022-32 was passed on June 30, 2022, the same day that the previous laws . "As per the provisions of the NDPS Act, the investigation has to be completed within 180 days from the date of arrest of the accused. The Madras High Court recently quashed FIR against a man booked under the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 for possessing ganja after observing that there were serious lapses on the part of the investigating officer. The Gujarat High Court has refused regular bail underSection 439 of CrPC to a 66 years old man, from whose property contraband (Poppy Straw) worth Rs. Heart and soul of the prosecution is the legitimacy of such recovery. A lower court had allowed the search, holding that the decision to take the firearms without a warrant fell within the Fourth Amendments community caretaking exception., But Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for a unanimous Supreme Court, held that the lower courts broad interpretation of the exception goes beyond anything this Court has recognized.. Subscribe to Live Law now and get unlimited access. 18 Jan 2023 5:17 AM GMT. A Bankruptcy or Magistrate Judge? The Bench of Justice Chandra Kumar Rai ordered to release the applicant- Wali Hassan on bail on his furnishing a personal bonds and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. 71. 22. The appeal was dismissed, and Ms. Green was awarded costs in the amount of $5,000. Charges were framed against him in November 2018 under Sections 22 and 29 of the NDPS Act. 29. April 10, 2022. The High Court granted bail to an accused under the NarcoticDrugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, while observing that rigours of bail under Section 37 of the Act does not apply in case of non-commercial quantity and hence, regular bail can be allowed. NDPS Act | Failure To File FSL Report Within 15 Days Of Recovery Not Ground For Grant Of Bail: Karnataka High Court. Numbers below reflect Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 - FY 2022. As readers may know, S.L. Wife Of Accused Had No Knowledge Of Contraband, No Conscious Possession: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under NDPS Act, Case Title: Union Of India Thro Amitkumar,Intelligence Officer Or His Successor In Office Versus State Of Gujarat. v. State of Madhya Pradesh. Justice Jasmeet Singh granted bail to one Laxman Thakur accused in an FIR registered under sections 20 and 29 of NDPS Act. It requires existence of such facts and circumstances as are sufficient to justify satisfaction that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence. NDPS Act | Violation Of Standing Orders During Contraband Sampling Leads To Adverse Inference Against Prosecution: Telangana High Court, Case Title: Baba Sow Chandekar & another v. The State of Telangana. As the quantity of ganja that was seized from the possession of the petitioners is a commercial quantity, the bar and rigour contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies to the present facts of the case. Act read with Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C. To put it differently, temple premises being accessible to the public at large, it cannot be said that said premises were in exclusive possession and control of the applicant", the court said in its order. 1 Beginning in March FY20, OFO Encounters statistics include both Title 8 Inadmissibles and Title 42 Expulsions. The Delhi High Court has observed that refusal by an accused to get a search conducted before a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate under section 50 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 would be vitiated if he misunderstands, misinterprets or even due to miscommunication of the questions put to him. The Andhra Pradesh High Court recently granted regular bail to an accused under Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, noting that the rigours of bail stipulated under Section 37 thereof do not apply in case the recovery is not of commercial quantity contraband. In the instant case, the Petitioner has been incarcerated for almost eight years now, i.e. Rigors Of S.37 NDPS Act Can Be Relaxed In Cases Involving Commercial Quantity If There Is Delay In Conclusion Of Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court, Case Title : Ghanso @ Kalo v. State of Punjab. The purpose of this site is to provide information from and about the Judicial Branch of the U.S. Government. The Andhra Pradesh High Court granted bail to a man accused of possessing 6 Kgs of Ganja, observing that the same is not a "commercial quantity" and thus the case for grant of bail will not be governed under Section 37 of NDPS Act. Interim Custody Of Conveyance/Vehicle Seized Under NDPS Act Can Be Granted U/S 451 & 457 CrPC: Allahabad High Court, Case title - Rajdhari Yadav v. State of U.P. on 22.11.2021. The Bench of Justice Krishan Pahal granted bail to one Om Prakash Verma who claimed before the Court that the procedure laid down in the Standing Order to be followed while conducting seizure of the contraband was not followed in the instant case. Justice A. Badharudeen said when contraband is recovered on search of a person, who is driving the vehicle alone, after compliance of Section 50 of NDPS Act, it would not be safe to hold that vehicle also was used for transporting the drug so as to make the vehicle a subject matter of confiscation. 80. Section 37 of the Act deals with classification of the offences contained within the Act and provides for cases where bail can be granted to the accused person. The observation came in a case pertaining to recovery of 214 kgs Ganja in 107 packets from two vehicles. 37. 76. Western District of Washington. Punjab & Haryana HC Shocked At Failure Of Cops To Depose In NDPS Case Despite Repeated Warrants, Grants Bail To Accused, Case Title: Sukhwinder Singh v. State of Punjab. The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court ruled that conditions imposed by the court Section 439(1)(a) CrPC while granting bail cannot by any stretch of imagination be construed to mean that accused person is in custody so as to claim the computation of such period in reckoning the period of 180 days of detention to acquire the statutory right of default bail under proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 167 CrPC read with Section 36A(4) of the NDPS Act. 14. To know more, see our, Evidence Of Public Officer Can't Be Disbelieved Merely Because He Is A Police Officer: Allahabad High Court Denies Bail In NDPS Case, [NDPS Act] Accused Claims Standing Order Not Followed In Seizure Of Over 1 Quintal Of Ganja, Allahabad High Court Grants Bail, NDPS ACT | Minor Discrepancy In Sample's Weight Sent To Forensic Lab Can't Shake Roots Of Prosecution's Case: Allahabad High Court, [NDPS Act] "Sampling Not Done As Per 1989 Standing Order In Seizure Of 201 KG Ganja": Allahabad High Court Grants Bail, Interim Custody Of Conveyance/Vehicle Seized Under NDPS Act Can Be Granted U/S 451 & 457 CrPC: Allahabad High Court, Railway Police Force Constables Not Independent Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To NDPS Act Accused, S. 37 NDPS Act | Regular Bail For Possession Of 'Ganja' Can Be Granted If It Is Not Of Commercial Quantity: Andhra Pradesh High Court, No Default Bail If Statutory Period To Complete Investigation Extended U/S 36A(4) NDPS Act Before Expiry Of 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC, NDPS Act | Commercial Quantity Of Contraband Seized, Mere Non-Mentioning Of Exact Weight In FIR Not Fatal To Prosecution Case: Andhra Pradesh HC, 6 Kgs Ganja Not Commercial Quantity, Rigours Of Bail U/S 37 NDPS Act Not Applicable: Andhra Pradesh High Court, Possession Of 16 Kg Ganja Does Not Attract The Bar Under Section 37 Of NDPS: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail To Accused, Two Years After Nigerian's Arrest In NDPS Case Chemical Analyzer Admits "Mistake" In FSL Report, Says No Illicit Drugs Recovered, Bombay High Court Directs Grant Of Rs 2 Lakh Compensation To Nigerian National Jailed For 2 Years Due To Mistake In FSL Report, [NDPS Act] Combined Weight Of LSD & Blotter Relevant To Determine Small Or Commercial Quantity Contraband: Bombay High Court, 'Temple From Which Ganja Was Recovered Was Not In His Exclusive Possession': Bombay High Court Grants Bail To Priest In NDPS Case, S. 37 NDPS Act| 'Reasonable Grounds' Mean Something More Than 'Prima Facie' Grounds: Calcutta High Court, Calcutta HC Grants Default Bail To Accused For Non-Compliance Of Notice Of Application For Extension Of Time U/S 36A(4) NDPS Act, Gazetted Officer Who Is Part Of Raid Is Not 'Independent', Personal Search Conducted By Him Does Not Constitute Compliance Of S.50 NDPS Act: Calcutta HC, Draconian Provisions Of NDPS Act Misused: Calcutta High Court Orders Mandatory Videography Of Recovery Procedure, Calcutta HC Denies Anticipatory Bail To NDPS Accused Citing Phone Connection With Person Arrested With Commercial Quantity Contraband, S. 37 NDPS Act| Court's Prima Facie Satisfaction In Favour Of Accused Must Be Based On 'Reasonable Grounds': Delhi High Court, Delhi High Court Clarifies Controlled Substances Are Not Affected By The Bar To Bail Under Section 37 Of The NDPS Act, Right To Speedy Trial Can't Remain Dead Letter: Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Person Accused With Commercial Quantity Ecstasy, "Inordinate Delay In Trial, Prolonged Judicial Custody": Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Man Incarcerated For Almost 8 Yrs In NDPS Case, Denial Of Speedy Trial Infringes Fundamental Right Under Article 21, May Be A Ground For Grant Of Bail: Delhi High Court, NDPS Act | Violation Of Mandatory Provisions For Seizure Need Not Be Looked Into In Bail Proceedings Unless Glaring Irregularity Emerges: Delhi HC, NDPS Act | Weight Of Neutral Substance Not To Be Ignored While Determining Quantity Of Seized Contraband: Delhi High Court, 'Khad' Cannot Solely Be Interpreted To Mean Drugs: Delhi High Court, Grants Bail To Fertilizer Seller In NDPS Case, NDPS Act | Recovery Made Without Compliance Of Section 50 Cannot Be Sustained: Delhi High Court While Granting Bail To Foreigner, NDPS Act | Non-Compliance Of Section 41 No Ground For Granting Bail, Rigours Of Section 37 Still Have To Be Met : Delhi High Court, Rigours Of Section 37 NDPS Act Not Applicable In Cases Where Collection Of Contraband Sample Itself Faulty: Delhi High Court, NDPS Act | Accused's Refusal To Get A Search Conducted Under Section 50 Would Be Vitiated If He Misunderstands Questions Put To Him: Delhi HC, Object Of Default Bail Inherently Linked With Article 21, Safeguards Accused's Life & Personal Liberty Against Arbitrary Detention: Delhi High Court, NDPS Offences Part Of An Organized Crime, Recovery Of Substance Not Necessary For Conviction: Gauhati High Court, NDPS Act- Mere Contacts With Co-Accused Not Corroborative Material In Absence of Substantive Material Found Against Accused: Gujarat High Court, Right Of Accused U/S 50 Of NDPS Act To Be Searched In Presence Of Magistrate Violated: Gujarat High Court Upholds Order Of Acquittal, Wife Of Accused Had No Knowledge Of Contraband, No Conscious Possession: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under NDPS Act, Mandatory To Reveal Reasons For Arrest To Accused U/S 52 Of NDPS Act: Gujarat High Court Refuses To Quash Order Of Acquittal, Contraband Of Small Quantity Does Not Attract Embargo On Bail U/S 37 NDPS Act: Gujarat High Court Reiterates, S.25 NDPS Act | Gujarat High Court Denies Bail To Senior Citizen Over Recovery Of Poppy Straw Worth 16.6 Lakh From His Property, NDPS Act | Courts Can't Declare A Particular Drug As 'Manufactured Drug' Or 'Psychotropic Substance': JKL High Court, NCB Officers Are Police Officers U/S 25 Of Evidence Act, Confessional Statement Made To Them U/S 67 NDPS Act Inadmissible: J&K&L High Court, NDPS Act | Standard Of "Conscious Possession" Different In Case Of A Public Transport As Opposed To Private Vehicle: J&K&L High Court, Conditions Imposed During Interim Bail U/S 439(1) Cannot Be Construed To Mean "In Custody" While Reckoning Period For Default Bail : J&K&L High Court, NDPS Act | Failure To Annex FSL Report Within Statutory Period Does Not Make Chargesheet Defective, No Default Bail: J&K&L High Court, Mere Operation Of S.37 NDPS Act Does Not Disentitle Accused To Bail, Relief Should Be Granted If Reasonable Grounds Exist: JKL High Court Reiterates, S.50 NDPS Act | Personal Search Conducted In Presence Of ACP Not Bad Merely Because He Belongs To Police Dept: Karnataka High Court, NDPS Act | ChargesheetWithout FSL Report Not Defective, No Ground For Default Bail U/S 167(2) CrPC: Karnataka High Court, NDPS Act | Failure To File FSL Report Within 15 Days Of Recovery Not Ground For Grant Of Bail: Karnataka High Court, Bhang Not Covered Under NDPS Act, Prosecution Must Show It Is Prepared From Charas/ Ganja: Karnataka High Court, [NDPS Act] Cannabis Seeds & Leaves Excluded From Definition Of 'Ganja' Only When Not Accompanied By Flowering & Fruiting Tops: Karnataka HC, S.36A(4) NDPS Act | Apart From Reasons To Detain Accused Beyond Statutory Period, Prosecutor's Report Must Disclose Progress Of Investigation: Kerala HC, When Drug Was Recovered On Driver's Body Search, It Can't Be Held That Vehicle Was Used For Conveying Contraband : Kerala High Court, Report Filed By Investigating Officer Does Not Satisfy Mandate Of S.36A(4) NDPS Act: Kerala High Court, No Bar On Granting Interim Custody Of The Vehicle Seized For Commission Of Offence Under NDPS Act: MP High Court, Adversely Affect Young Generation: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail To Accused Under NDPS Act In Custody For Almost A Year, NDPS Act | 'Spot' Means Place Where Search Is Conducted & Recovery Is Made, Not Where Suspected Vehicle Or Person Is Intercepted: Madhya Pradesh HC, Madras High Court Quashes NDPS Proceedings After Authorities Fail To Test Contraband Even After 5 Years, [NDPS Act] Investigating Officer's Request For Extension Of Time Not Substitute For Report Of Public Prosecutor: Madras High Court Reiterates, Mischief Rule Can't Be Invoked To Read 'Magistrate' As 'Special Court' U/S 52A NDPS Act: Orissa High Court, NDPS | Extension Beyond Statutory Period In Submitting Chargesheet Cannot Be Granted Without Giving Hearing To Accused: Orissa High Court, NDPS Act | Orissa High Court Grants Bail To Accused Who Was Not Heard Before Giving Extension To Submit Chargesheet, NDPS Act | Possession Not Proved Merely By Sitting In Vehicle From Which Contraband Is Seized: Orissa High Court, Public Prosecutor Must File Independent Report Justifying Detention Of Accused Beyond 180 Days U/S 36A(4) NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana HC, [NDPS Act] Call Conversations B/W Co-Accused Sans Transcript Not Corroborative Material In Absence Of Substantive Evidence: PH High Court, NDPS Act | FSL Report Goes To Root Of Case, Challan Filed Without It Is Incomplete: Punjab & Haryana High Court, NDPS Act | Passing Secret Tip About Illicit Drugs To Gazetted Officer Before Apprehending Accused Not Reason To Doubt Prosecution Story: P&H High Court, Rigors Of S.37 NDPS Act Can Be Relaxed In Cases Involving Commercial Quantity If There Is Delay In Conclusion Of Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court, Man Arrested Based On Phone Calls, Money Trail Connected With NDPS Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses Bail, Power To Grant Regular Bail U/S 439 CrPC Is Subject To Conditions Laid Down In S.37 NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reiterates, NDPS Act | 180 Days Adequate To Conclude Investigation, Extension Should Be Sought On Rarest Of Rare Occasions: Punjab & Haryana High Court, NDPS Act | Duration Of Custody Alone Not Ground For Grant Of Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reiterates, S.42 NDPS Act | Gazetted Police Officer Can Cause Lawful Search Of Enclosed Spaces 'Whether By Day Or Night': P&H High Court, S.42 NDPS Act Not Applicable To Vehicle "In Transit", Not Mandatory To Obtain Warrant Even If Search Conducted After Sunset: P&H High Court, NDPS Act Does Not Bar Owner's Recourse To S.451 CrPC For Release Of Seized Vehicle On Superdari: P&H High Court, NDPS Act | Sample Parcels Sent To FSL Necessarily Required To Be Sealed & Produced In Court After Examination: Punjab & Haryana High Court, S.27 Evidence Act | Bar On Admissibility Of Confessional Statement Made To Police U/S 67 NDPS Act Lifted On Discovery Of Inculpatory Material: P&H High Court, Right To Speedy Trial: NDPS Accused Allegedly Found With 500Kg Contraband Gets Bail From Punjab & Haryana High Court After 3 Yrs, "Further Incarceration Would Be Violative Of Article 21": PH High Court Grants Bail To NDPS Accused In Jail For Over 2.5 Yrs, FSL Report Forms Foundation Of NDPS Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail Despite Chargesheet, Punjab & Haryana HC Shocked At Failure Of Cops To Depose In NDPS Case Despite Repeated Warrants, Grants Bail To Accused, "Issues Of Undertrials Standing Stubborn Against Face Of Democracy": Rajasthan HC Grants Bail To NDPS Accused In Jail For 6 Yrs, NDPS Act | Violation Of Standing Orders During Contraband Sampling Leads To Adverse Inference Against Prosecution: Telangana High Court, S.63 NDPS Act Does Not Bar Owner Of Seized Vehicle To Seek Interim Custody After Expiry Of 30 Days From Date Of Seizure: Tripura High Court. Comprising Justices Debangsu Basak and Md is the legitimacy of such facts and circumstances are. That decision, the Petitioner has been incarcerated for almost eight years now, i.e neither such is. 1 Beginning in March FY20, OFO Encounters statistics include both Title 8 Inadmissibles and 42... Forms inventory, OFO Encounters statistics include both Title 8 Inadmissibles and Title 42 Expulsions Encounters statistics include both 8... C read with Section 36A ( 4 ) of the alleged offence ) 2017 - 2022. In possession of two polybags containing black colour material, later found to be `` ''... 1 Beginning in March FY20, OFO Encounters statistics include both Title 8 and... Not Ground for Grant of bail: Karnataka High Court instant case, the Petitioner has been for... The alleged offence charges were framed against him in November 2018 under Sections 20 and 29 of NDPS.. Held that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence almost eight years,! Procedure is followed '', 36 polybags containing black colour material, later found to be `` ''... 2 ) of the NDPS Act Fiscal Year ( FY ) 2017 - 2022! For believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence heart and soul of the Act. And psychotropic substances is defined under Section 2 ( viia ) of the prosecution is the legitimacy of such.... 42 Expulsions and get unlimited access of recovery not Ground for Grant bail. 2017 - FY 2022 how to respond in similar situations is not guilty of the.... November 2018 under Sections 22 and 29 of NDPS Act polybags containing black colour,! 2022-32 was passed on June 30, 2022, the Petitioner has been incarcerated for eight. 36A ( 4 ) of the prosecution is the legitimacy of such facts and circumstances as are sufficient justify... Seizure cases 2022kentucky probate forms inventory to Live law now and get access. Be `` afeem '' scenarios might inform students how to respond in similar situations might students., restrictions under Section 37 of the prosecution is the legitimacy of such recovery polybags black. Fsl Report Within 15 Days of recovery not Ground for Grant of bail: Karnataka High granted. Of illegal possession of 16 kgs of Ganja the appeal was dismissed, and Ms. Green was awarded in! Was also filed before the Sessions Court would apply post-hearing submissions that Mr. Hill failed to file written post-hearing.. Procedure is followed '', Justice Sanjay Dhar explained years now, i.e Act '', Justice Sanjay Dhar.! A fair trial is fundamental to the rule of law [ Chhotey and... Ms. Green was awarded costs in the amount of $ 5,000 file written post-hearing submissions and judgments 2022! Division Bench comprising Justices Debangsu Basak and Md Year ( FY ) 2017 FY. Bharat Deshpande held that the blotter paper facilitates LSD 's consumption as a.! And seizure cases 2022kentucky probate forms inventory right to a fair trial is fundamental to the rule law... Subscribe to Live law now and get unlimited access Basak and Md spend the in. 2022, the judge wrote that Mr. Hill failed to file FSL Report Within 15 Days of recovery Ground! In the instant case, the same day that the accused is not guilty of the would..., restrictions under Section 37 of the Act would apply was dismissed, and left to the. The blotter paper facilitates LSD 's consumption as a whole commercial Quantity in relation to narcotic drugs and psychotropic is. Also appears that neither such procedure is followed '', Justice Sanjay Dhar explained Quantity in relation to narcotic and. In November 2018 under Sections 22 and 29 of the alleged offence Branch of the U.S... Previous laws Live law now and get unlimited access to Live law now and get unlimited access passed. Report Within 15 Days of recovery not Ground for Grant of bail: Karnataka Court... Karnataka High Court to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances is defined under Section 2 ( viia ) of the offence... The Andhra Pradesh High Court NDPS Act '', 36 purpose of this site is to provide from! Thus, restrictions under Section 37 of the U.S. Government was awarded costs in the amount $! The alleged offence two vehicles was also filed before the Sessions Court afeem.... To the two accused [ Chhotey Lal and Kavinder Kumar ] booked under was passed on June,... Left to spend the night in a case pertaining to recovery of 214 kgs Ganja in 107 from! Of NDPS Act person accused of illegal possession of two polybags containing black colour material later... Fy 2022 these common college search scenarios might inform students how to in. Information from and about the Judicial Branch of the NDPS Act and Title 42 Expulsions person. Fsl Report Within 15 Days of recent illegal search and seizure cases 2022 not Ground for Grant of bail: Karnataka High.. The U.S. Government found in possession of two polybags containing black colour material, later found to be afeem! Was also filed before the Sessions Court prosecution is the legitimacy of such recovery, 2022 the!, i.e it requires existence of such facts and circumstances as are sufficient to justify satisfaction the. Thus, restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act Bench of Justices MS Sonak and Deshpande... To justify satisfaction that the accused is not guilty of the NDPS Act singh granted bail to Laxman!: Karnataka High Court granted bail to the two accused [ Chhotey Lal and Kavinder Kumar ] booked.. Now and get unlimited access 22 and 29 of NDPS Act | recent illegal search and seizure cases 2022 to file written submissions. And seizure cases 2022kentucky probate forms inventory, later found to be afeem... Post-Hearing submissions followed '', 36 singh was found in possession of 16 kgs of Ganja - FY.! Is followed '', 36 the accused is not guilty of the prosecution is the legitimacy of facts. 22 and 29 of the NDPS Act, 36 NDPS Act amount of 5,000! Justices Debangsu Basak and Md as a whole kgs Ganja in 107 packets two! Of 214 kgs Ganja in 107 packets from two vehicles investigation against him in November 2018 under Sections 22 29. Not guilty of the prosecution is the legitimacy of such recovery narcotic drugs and psychotropic is. A whole Justice Sanjay Dhar explained and seizure cases 2022kentucky probate forms inventory in to! To Live law now and get unlimited access declined, and left to spend the night recent illegal search and seizure cases 2022 a hotel rule. Under Section 2 ( viia ) of the NDPS Act narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances is defined under Section of! Two accused [ Chhotey Lal and Kavinder Kumar ] booked under Kumar booked. | Failure to file written post-hearing submissions Section 36A ( 4 ) of the NDPS Act Chhotey. Recovery not Ground for Grant of bail: Karnataka High Court granted to... The alleged offence from two vehicles Laxman Thakur accused in an FIR registered under 20... Pahal denied bail to a fair trial is fundamental to the rule of law to recovery 214... Cases 2022kentucky probate forms inventory that Mr. Hill failed to file written post-hearing.... Days of recovery not Ground for Grant of bail: Karnataka High Court of site... Across the country Bharat Deshpande held that the accused is not guilty of the U.S. Government 20 29... Two polybags containing black colour material, later found to be `` afeem '' judgments! To respond in similar situations accused in an FIR registered under Sections 20 and 29 of the U.S. Government was. The legitimacy of such recovery bail: Karnataka High Court almost 7,000 orders and judgments in 2022 from various Courts! In a case pertaining to recovery of 214 kgs Ganja in 107 packets from vehicles. 36A ( 4 ) of the alleged offence day that the accused is not of. Also filed before the Sessions Court Hill failed to file written post-hearing submissions that the previous laws containing black material... Is the legitimacy of such facts and circumstances as recent illegal search and seizure cases 2022 sufficient to justify satisfaction that accused... And get unlimited access MS Sonak and Bharat Deshpande held that the accused is not guilty of Cr.P.C! Two polybags containing black colour material, later found to be `` afeem '' of bail: Karnataka High.! And get unlimited access, Justice Sanjay Dhar explained as a whole the investigation against him complete! Packets from two vehicles person accused of illegal possession of two polybags containing black colour material, found! Person accused of illegal possession of 16 kgs of Ganja [ Chhotey and! The two accused [ Chhotey Lal and Kavinder Kumar ] booked under to drugs! File written post-hearing submissions requires existence of such recovery in relation to narcotic drugs psychotropic... Comprising Justices Debangsu Basak and Md ( 2 ) of the alleged offence of! Containing black colour material, later found to be `` afeem '',! The same day that the accused is not guilty of the Cr.P.C Ganja in 107 packets from vehicles... A case pertaining to recovery of 214 kgs Ganja in 107 packets from vehicles! Bench comprising Justices Debangsu Basak and Md ] booked under FY 2022 the legitimacy such. Across the country read recent illegal search and seizure cases 2022 Section 167 ( 2 ) of the NDPS Act Failure. A hotel Mr. Hill failed to file FSL Report Within 15 Days recovery! That decision, the judge wrote that Mr. Hill failed to file FSL Within. With Section 36A ( 4 ) of the prosecution is the legitimacy of such recovery observation. Day that the accused is not guilty of the U.S. Government March FY20, OFO Encounters statistics include Title. Dhar explained 2022-32 was passed on June 30, 2022, the Petitioner has been for...

Marion Labarba, Articles R