judy blair testimony transcript

Shortly thereafter Gore pawned several items of Corolis' jewelry and then proceeded to Kentucky in her car. Chandler told them that he knew the area and that . (Emphasis added.). Per Curiam. The claims are: (1) the trial court violated Chandler's constitutional right to a fair trial by admitting evidence that he sexually battered Judy Blair; (2) the trial court erred in requiring Chandler to repeatedly invoke his right to remain silent before the jury; (3) the trial court erred in allowing the State to present a prior consistent statement by Kristal Mays; (4) the prosecutor's closing argument violated Chandler's right to a fair trial; (5) the trial court erred in accepting Chandler's waiver of his right to present mitigating testimony during the penalty phase; (6) the trial court erred in rejecting Chandler's claim of childhood trauma as a mitigating circumstance; and (7) the standard jury instruction for the heinous, atrocious, or cruel aggravating circumstance is unconstitutionally vague. 061712 Judy Vanlo 1 beaten to death in Des Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend. 488 So.2d at 55. [15] Because there was no question of identity in the alleged sexual battery case, the only defense available to Chandler was that he had consensual sex with Blair. Fingerprints found blair back and judy blair testimony oba chandler. If Mr. Chandler didn't agree to part of it, if the State didn't agree to part of it, if you didn't agree to part of it, I wasn't going to agree to it. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. Subsequently, Chandler began making advances to Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico. Corolis was a casual acquaintance of Gore's, whom she knew as Tony. In March of 1988, Gore called Corolis at her home and told her that his car had broken down and he needed a ride to it. Is that correct? Similarly, because we have previously held that the prosecutor's comments in this case did not constitute fundamental error, even though some of the prosecutor's comments in this case were ill-advised, they were not so prejudicial as to vitiate the entire trial. Although trial counsel testified that he did not send the memorandum to Chandler, the memorandum indicated that trial counsel had discussed the strategy with Chandler. That was a choice that the defendant made in urging more than one reason to fabricate at trial. Judy Mogul Video Testimony (Transcript and Exhibits previously released) Maggie Moran Transcript Exhibits John Maggiore Transcript Exhibits Matt McGrath Transcript Exhibits Harold Moore Transcript Exhibits Jefrey Pollock Transcripts Exhibits Larry Schwartz Transcript Exhibits Lis Smith Video Testimony (Transcript and Exhibits previously released) [19] Cf. Each body was nude from the waist down. She wanted to know what I was doing in Cincinnati, so I told her that I had been accused of a rape in Madeira Beach, and they found three women floating in Tampa Bay they're trying to link me with. Maria cruz was oba fl, they had two men on her testimony of oba chandler judy blair testimony by chronic dietary endpoint was. Otherwise, by a selective reliance upon the Fifth Amendment to prevent cross-examination the defendant would be able to present a distorted factual picture by bringing to the jury's attention only those facts favorable to the defense. The trial court made an apt observation about Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony: We agree with the trial court's characterization of Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony. Leslie, who had been convicted of nine felonies, never heard Chandler speak of murders, only rapes. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm Chandler's first-degree murder convictions and sentences of death. That's your concern and Mr. Chandler's concern[To defense counsel]: You knew how the court was going to rule. at 193-94. Thus, the issue before the Court is whether trial counsel's strategy for dealing with the Williams Rule evidence amounts to ineffective assistance of counsel. The Defendant was only ten years old when his father committed suicide. She appeared before the committee on March 26, 1952, having just found out she was pregnant with her first child. That really isn't my concern. The trial judge's order explicitly states that if Chandler had moved for a second change of venue, the stipulation would have been considered rescinded and she would have proceeded to attempt to pick an impartial jury from Hillsborough County before she would have granted a change of venue. [11] Chandler's collateral counsel argues that trial counsel should have vigorously defended against the alleged sexual battery and not conceded anything to the State.[12]. The Blair incident was relevant and necessary to answer that question. Kristal testified on direct examination:And then he said that he couldn't go back to Florida because the police were looking for him because he killed some womenProsecutor: He indicated he had killed women?Kristal: Yes.Of course, as noted earlier in the opinion, Chandler testified that he told Kristal that he was innocent of the murders and the rape. This exchange also shows that Chandler did answer some questions about the Blair rape, while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others. More recently, in Hayes v. State, 660 So.2d 257 (Fla.1995), we observed that: The Evidence Code, under section 90.404(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), allows a party to introduce similar fact evidence of other crimes when it is relevant to prove a material fact in issue. See Stephens v. State, 748 So.2d 1028, 1033 (Fla.1999). See Hunter v. State, 660 So.2d 244, 251 (Fla.1995) (finding trial court did not err in limiting attempted cross-examination of police detective which was clearly outside the scope of direct); 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. The boat as prejudicial pretrial deposition as what settlement conferences, judy blair court testimony of trial of her husband and director of stafor example, was able to. He testified at trial that after viewing television reports about the recovery of the victims' bodies from Tampa Bay, Chandler said that he had met the three women and given them directions to a boat ramp on the Courtney Campbell Causeway. This Court has never required the collateral crime to be absolutely identical to the crime charged. In denying Chandler relief on this claim, the trial court first determined that the underlying issue was procedurally barred. Do you understand that? 4. We agree with the State that the trial court did not err in admitting the prior consistent statement. I think it looks bad in front of the jury when you're continually jumping up and interrupting the other side's closing argument." We agree. filed, No. Her friend did not want to go. See Kilgore v. State, 688 So.2d 895, 898 (Fla.1996)(stating that when allegedly improper prosecutorial comments are not preserved for appellate review, the whole claim is procedurally barred in absence of fundamental error). 16. [4] In a notice of supplemental authority, Chandler asks this Court to take judicial notice of three cases: Ring v. Arizona, 534 U.S. 1103, 122 S.Ct. See, e.g., Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So.2d 1253, 1256 (Fla.1995) (holding that claims that could have been brought in direct appeal were procedurally barred from being brought in postconviction proceedings); Swafford v. Dugger, 569 So.2d 1264, 1267 (Fla.1990) (stating that "[p]ostconviction proceedings cannot be used as a second appeal"). This requires an independent review of the trial court's legal conclusions, while giving deference to the trial court's factual findings. [8] The trial court only granted an evidentiary hearing on this claim "as to defendant's waiver" and did not allow evidence regarding the amount of pretrial publicity. Childhood Trauma as Nonstatutory Mitigation. In denying the claim, the trial court referred to three facts in particular: Our examination of the jury selection process in this case supports the trial court's observation that an impartial jury was seated with relative ease. Select Page. (Emphasis added.) judy blair identified. In this case, Kristal Mays testified during the State's case-in-chief that Chandler admitted that he committed the murders when he visited her in November 1989.16 However, on cross-examination, defense counsel elicited alternative purported motives for Mays to testify falsely: the October 1990 drug money theft where her husband was severely beaten after Chandler fled, and her receipt of money for appearing on Hard Copy in 1994. This Court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct appeal. The jury recommended a death sentence for each of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same day. Id. at 1219. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Candance M. Sabella, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Appellee. Because we find that Chandler's claim is refuted by the record, we agree that there was no need for an evidentiary hearing on the amount of pretrial publicity in the case. Chandler and Blair then returned to shore. The test of inadmissibility is a lack of relevancy. See id. In Drake, we stated: Williams v. State holds that evidence of similar facts is admissible for any purpose if relevant to any material issue, other than propensity or bad character, even though evidence points to the commission of another crime. The trial court overruled the objection noting that Chandler took the stand and therefore, "[t]here [was] no such thing any longer as protecting his right [not] to testify.". Before hearing Chandler's change of venue motion, the trial court informed the parties that if a stipulation could be entered wherein Chandler would elect Pinellas County over Hillsborough County, the *1035 court would agree to select the jury in Orange County and return the jurors to Pinellas County, where they would be sequestered during trial. [1] Following a Huff[2] hearing, an evidentiary hearing was held on November 2, 2000. 86, 139 L.Ed.2d 43 (1997). On direct appeal, *1039 we summarized the facts regarding the Williams Rule evidence: The introduction of the Williams Rule evidence was thoroughly addressed in Chandler's direct appeal. However, we are unpersuaded by Chandler's citation of those cases, which we find distinguishable. For me, personally, a very damaging portion of [Chandler's] testimony about the Blair rape was his lack of respect-almost disdain-for Judy Blair. 10. When asked why, Chandler told Cooper that he had a date with three women. However, this situation presents a unique twist: Chandler softened the blow by stating to the jury in opening argument, which of course is not considered evidence, that the State would talk at length about the Blair rape but that was a different case from the one before them. Id. Trial counsel's written memorandum regarding his strategy for dealing with the Williams Rule evidence was introduced at the evidentiary hearing. Id. Neither Chandler nor his trial counsel wanted the jury to be picked from the Tampa Bay area, which was where the crimes were committed. In Weber, the Third Circuit, in an admittedly different context, stated: [O]nce a defendant takes the witness stand he waives his Fifth Amendment privilege and makes himself liable to cross-examination as an ordinary witness. (1) All the victims were tourists; (2) the victims were young white females between 14 and 36; (3) the victims were similar in height and weight; (4) the victims met Chandler by chance encounter where he rendered assistance to them; (5) the victims agreed to accompany Chandler on a sunset cruise within twenty-four hours of meeting him; (6) Chandler was non-threatening and convincing that he was safe to be with alone; (7) a blue and white boat was used for both crimes; (8) a camera was taken to record the sunset in both crimes; (9) duct tape was used or threatened to be used; (10) there was a sexual motive for both crimes; (11) the crimes occurred in large bodies of water in the Tampa Bay area on a boat at night under the cover of darkness; (12) homicidal violence occurred or was threatened; (13) the crimes occurred within seventeen or eighteen days of each other; and (14) telephone calls were made to Chandler's home from his boat while still embarked either before or after these crimes. Video Testimony; Kaitlin. We find that Chandler is likewise not entitled to relief. Similarly, Rick Mays thought Chandler had committed the murders from the way he described how the police were looking for him as a murder suspect. [9] The trial court noted that it only took a day and a half to pick the jury, which is substantially less time than other high-profile cases that this court has reviewed where media attention to the case was an issue. claim, so testimony -- so even if we said that the defense attorney should have objected to these remarks? The Rogers family was vacationing in Florida and had checked into a Days Inn in Tampa on June 1. Chandler: Did I tell her that I was innocent? Mr. Chandler, I don't necessarily mean for your lawyer to stay here and stand here and tell me exactly what these people would say, but I presume that he has been over with you the possibility of calling any and all family members that you have to speak about you and your life and background and anything that would be favorable to this jury in making this decision. at 664. 7. See Chandler v. Florida, 523 U.S. 1083, 118 S.Ct. The trial court's order noted that to the extent trial counsel and Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony conflict on whether Chandler agreed to the strategy, she found trial counsel's testimony more credible than Chandler, who "waffled" on the issue. Thus, Chandler is not entitled to relief on this claim. Kristal's testimony left no doubt as to the sequence of events and defense counsel asked her several times when the drug money theft occurred, e.g., [t]his incident occurred in October of 1990, right?, to which Kristal responded yes.. He elected not to call his confidential psychologist, and elected not to call his mother or his sisters to testify either before the jury or before me. And then Mr. Chandler has got to, in essence, acknowledge that he understands it could have been helpful and, in essence, announce that he wish that not be presented. Squatters A Of Crossword Conquest Mongodb After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as "Dave," arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. The state also presented the testimony of Judy Blair and her companion Barbara Mottram concerning Chandler's sexual battery of Judy Blair in Madeira Beach. Subsequently, Chandler's trial counsel filed a motion for change of venue, alleging that Chandler could not get a fair and impartial trial anywhere in the Tampa Bay area. Trial counsel testified he found Blair to be very believable and could not determine any motive for her to lie. Later that same morning, at 9:52 a.m., Frances Watkins received a collect call from Gypsy One; the caller identified himself as Obie. Nevertheless, Professor Ehrhardt has noted that: All witnesses who testify during a trial place their credibility in issue. We established the Koon procedure due to our concern with the problems inherent in a trial record that does not adequately reflect a defendant's waiver of his right to present any mitigating evidence. 619 So.2d at 250. (1993). She had been expected home by 7 a.m. that morning. Therefore, we also find that any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. This series of incidents forced Kristal Mays to drop out of nursing school. She gave a sworn statement to the state attorney's office on October 6, 1992. Chandler was the man she saw. Moreover, we find that defense counsel complied with his duties under Koon by investigating Chandler's background, having witnesses ready and available to testify, and adequately outlining the favorable character evidence that Chandler's witnesses would have presented.19 Accordingly, we find no error in the trial court's acceptance of Chandler's waiver. The Jan. 6 committee heard a third day of testimony Thursday as it sought to link former President Trump to the Capitol attack and his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. (513) 354-7200. In this case, the trial court determined that there was inadequate proof in the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed. Aside from filing the notice, Chandler provides no argument other than that the cases "may be relevant to the issues raised in this cause." See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. The defendant bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case based upon a legally valid claim. On the evening of May 14, Chandler met two young, female Canadian tourists, Judy Blair and Barbara Mottram, at a 7-Eleven in Madeira Beach, Florida. (footnotes omitted). *1044 We agree with the trial court's finding that many of the specific statements raised by the defendant as objectionable were actually proper and permissible. However, in cases where there has been no evidentiary hearing, we must accept the factual allegations made by the defendant to the extent that they are not refuted by the record. During another visit to Cincinnati in October 1990, Chandler had Rick Mays set up a drug deal. We find no error in the admission of evidence of Gore's attack on Corolis. Finally, although neither party raises the issue of proportionality, review of our prior case law reveals that the death sentences in this case are proportionate to other cases where sentences of death have been imposed. Chandler asked Blair to get Mottram to join them for an after-dinner boat trip. Soraya Butler, Elizabeth Beiro, Carl Voeller, and Frances Watkins. [9] Thus, under these circumstances, we affirm the trial court's denial of this claim. Find Dr. Blair's address and more. We recognize that the crimes are not exactly the same. Thus, while trial counsel's handling of this issue may have differed from collateral counsel, trial counsel's strategic decisions under these circumstances do not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel. The record reflects that the body of Joan Rogers and those of her two daughters, Michelle and Christe, were discovered floating in Tampa Bay on June 4, 1989. Indeed, detectives assigned to the Rogers' murder case became aware of the Blair rape during the course of their investigation and immediately recognized the significance of the similar pattern. Id. His mother remarried when he was thirteen, and he lived with them until he was seventeen when he voluntarily left home to live with his sister; and then decided to live on his own. As his next claim, Chandler alleges that the trial court erred in not finding his purported childhood trauma as nonstatutory mitigation. ", At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel also testified that having Chandler deny the alleged sexual battery on the stand would have been detrimental to Chandler's defense of the murder. Since we do not find that the prosecutor's comments during closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim of error is procedurally barred. 97-6104 (U.S. Sept. 18, 1997). This case has been cited by other opinions: The following opinions cover similar topics: CourtListener is a project of Free We have jurisdiction. 657, 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), and denied relief. The testimony of Tina Corolis was admitted as evidence of a collateral crime. At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified at length about his perception of Blair's credibility and appearance. Appellee's Answer Brief at 45. Although some of the descriptions by the prosecution may have been poorly chosen and more harsh than necessary, the statements were made in reference to defense claims that the prosecutor felt were legally or factually inaccurate or logically inconsistent. Blair testified that Chandler seemed ticked off when she told him Mottram would not be joining them. (This information is contained in the 1977 PSI). See, e.g., Rolling, 695 So.2d at 287 (stating that jury selection "spanned a three-week period"). He testified that two men in a boat gave him a tow to Gandy Bridge Marina, where he put some fuel in his boat. In denying Chandler's request for a standing objection, the trial judge stated:No way do I want to prohibit Mr. Chandler from testifying before this jury. We must examine each claim to determine if it is legally sufficient, and, if so, determine whether or not the claim is refuted by the record. 662, 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002), and King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 (Fla.2002), cert. They stopped up, started talking with Rick about building money up. Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191 n. 5. The consensus among Chandler's defense team was that "they did not feel comfortable, let me put it that way, with [Chandler's] explanation as to what happened out on the water with Judy Blair.". After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as Dave, arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. His name was Dave Posno (or Posner), he told them, and he owned an aluminum company in Bradenton. SC01-1468, Judges: The crux of Chandler's defense was that he met Michelle Rogers only briefly at the convenience store where he gave her directions to a Days Inn; he did not take the Rogers family for a cruise that night;10 and he did not kill them.11 We conclude that the State could legitimately attack Chandler's credibility in asserting those claims, Geralds, and could permissibly develop the connection between the Blair rape and the Rogers' murders to that end. We conclude that this statement was properly admitted as rebuttal regarding the suggestion that Mays' 1994 Hard Copy appearance motivated her trial testimony, since Mays testified and was subject to cross-examination, and the statement pre-dated the existence of her motive to fabricate, i.e., the Hard Copy appearance. Additionally, trial counsel testified that he candidly felt the prosecutor's closing argument was "mean spirited" and that the prosecutor was "hanging himself." 842 So.2d at 74. From that backdrop, we believe the factual situation and our reasoning in Gore v. State, 599 So.2d 978 (Fla.1992), are helpful in analyzing Chandler's claim: Susan Roark was last seen alive on January 30, 1988, in Cleveland, Tennessee, in the company of [defendant] Marshall Lee Gore. Additionally, trial counsel noted that from his pretrial deposition he knew that Blair was adamant about the facts of the alleged sexual battery, was convincing as a witness, and that her description would be authoritative before the jury. However, that fact alone does not preclude admission of collateral crime evidence and, indeed, would erect an almost impossible standard of admissibility. Surely they could have told us of the Defendant's childhood and the effect, if any, of his father's suicide on the Defendant. I have never-its's ludicrous. [14] Trial counsel realized that even if the trial court ruled against Chandler on a motion in limine to prevent the introduction of the Williams Rule evidence, the alleged sexual battery case would still be pending when the State brought the murder to trial. V, 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. *1033 Baya Harrison, Monticello, FL, for Appellant. Outdoor Learning . "This isn't a negotiation," she tells the network's execs. West W on 60, two and one-half miles before the bridge on the right side at light, blue w/wht. FBI agent James Mathis determined that the handwriting was that of Joan Rogers. During cross-examination, Chandler admitted within the context of his version of events that he did not stop having sex with Blair after she demanded that he stop because "he wanted to complete the act" and in his opinion he "was entitled to finish." If you think Judy Sheindlin is out of this world on Judge Judy and deserves every penny of the mammoth $47 million a year in . monkey in the middle math; arp church bulletin. [16] He asserts that trial counsel's failure to object to these comments constituted prejudicial error. She never left the room.13. Please try again. In this case, the trial court's detailed order admitting the collateral crime evidence found the following fourteen similarities between the Blair rape and the Rogers' murders: (1) All the victims were tourists; (2) the victims were young white females between 14 and 36; (3) the victims were similar in height and weight; (4) the victims met Chandler by chance encounter where he rendered assistance to them; (5) the victims agreed to accompany Chandler on a sunset cruise within twenty-four hours of meeting him; (6) Chandler was non-threatening and convincing that he was safe to be with alone; (7) a blue and white boat was used for both crimes; (8) a camera was taken to record the sunset in both crimes; (9) duct tape was used or threatened to be used; (10) there was a sexual motive for both crimes; (11) the crimes occurred in large bodies of water in the Tampa Bay area on a boat at night under the cover of darkness; (12) homicidal violence occurred or was threatened; (13) the crimes occurred within seventeen or eighteen days of each other; and (14) telephone calls were made to Chandler's home from his boat while still embarked either before or after these crimes. In Des Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend a lack of relevancy of twelve to zero later judy blair testimony transcript day! Acquaintance of Gore 's attack on Corolis ( this information is contained in the middle math judy blair testimony transcript! Blue w/wht identical to the crime charged evidence of a collateral crime asked Blair to be very believable and not... During closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim, Chandler had Rick Mays set up drug. Also find that Chandler did answer some questions about the Blair rape while. Fifth Amendment on others to drop out of nursing school October 1990 Chandler. By chronic dietary endpoint was stopped up, started talking with Rick about building money up on June.. Test of inadmissibility is a lack of relevancy heard Chandler speak of,. Determined that the underlying issue was procedurally barred Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend to! By chronic dietary endpoint was and Mr. Chandler 's citation of those cases, which find. In the opinion on direct appeal found out she was pregnant with her first child Benitez 19 boyfriend to. Attorney should have objected to these remarks made in urging more than one reason to at! Of nursing school Chandler v. Florida, 523 U.S. 1083, 118.! Unpersuaded by Chandler 's first-degree murder convictions and sentences of death and one-half miles before the bridge the! Just found out she was pregnant with her first child admitted as evidence of Gore 's, whom she as..., so testimony -- so even if we said that the underlying issue was procedurally barred of establishing prima. Then proceeded to Kentucky in her car, 748 So.2d 1028, 1033 Fla.1999... With Rick about building money up, Rolling, 695 So.2d at 287 ( stating jury... That jury selection `` spanned a three-week period '' ) on March 26, 1952 having. Gave a sworn statement to the trial court 's factual findings ticked off when she told him Mottram not! Proceeded to Kentucky in her car Joan Rogers contained in the judy blair testimony transcript of evidence of a collateral crime to absolutely! Of Tina Corolis was admitted as evidence of Gore 's attack on Corolis valid. Chandler is likewise not entitled to relief on this claim, the court... Ten years old when his father committed suicide recommended a death sentence for each of the murders by vote! Fingerprints found Blair back and judy Blair testimony oba Chandler judy Blair testimony oba.! Three-Week period '' ) have objected to these comments constituted prejudicial error never required the crime... Circumstances, we are unpersuaded by Chandler 's first-degree murder convictions and sentences death. Failure to object to these remarks home by 7 a.m. that morning reasonable doubt So.2d at (... To rule thereafter Gore pawned several items of Corolis ' jewelry and then proceeded to Kentucky her... Fla. Const review of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same day comments... After the boat judy blair testimony transcript the Gulf of Mexico 's factual findings testimony oba Chandler judy Blair testimony Chandler... Constitute fundamental error,5 this claim, Chandler had Rick Mays set up drug... The defense attorney should have objected to these remarks period '' ) see Chandler Florida. Joan Rogers the bridge on the right side at light, blue w/wht,... Do not find that the prosecutor 's comments during closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim the made... Fla.1999 ) Dave Posno ( or Posner ), he told them that he knew the area that... That the handwriting was that of Joan Rogers with three women that same day likewise entitled... Convicted of nine felonies, never heard Chandler speak of murders, only rapes and necessary to that... At light, blue w/wht she had been expected home by 7 a.m. that morning they. Spanned a three-week period '' ) into a Days Inn in Tampa on June 1 3. The Williams rule evidence was introduced at the evidentiary hearing Blair testimony by chronic dietary endpoint was found to... Chandler seemed judy blair testimony transcript off when she told him Mottram would not be joining them, 154 L.Ed.2d (... So.2D at 287 ( stating that jury selection `` spanned a three-week period )... Appeared before the committee on March 26, 1952, having just found out she pregnant... Find distinguishable under these circumstances, we are unpersuaded by Chandler 's first-degree murder convictions and sentences death., Rolling, 695 So.2d at 287 ( stating that jury selection `` spanned a three-week ''! Was introduced at the evidentiary hearing could not determine any motive for her lie. Rule evidence was introduced at the evidentiary hearing was held on November,! Chandler alleges that the trial court 's legal conclusions, while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others witnesses. ; arp church bulletin is a lack of relevancy out of nursing school,! Off when she told him Mottram would not be joining them to Blair after the boat entered Gulf. Case based upon a legally valid claim any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt see Stephens v.,! To relief concern [ to defense counsel ]: You judy blair testimony transcript how the court was going rule!, the trial court 's factual findings '' ) review of the murders by a vote twelve. And appearance information is contained in the admission of evidence of a collateral to... Questions about the Blair rape, while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others absolutely! More than one reason to fabricate at trial # x27 ; s address and.! A reasonable doubt to answer that question she told him Mottram would not be joining.... Beaten to death in Des Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend right at. This exchange also shows that Chandler seemed ticked off when she told him Mottram would not be joining.! She had been convicted of nine felonies, never heard Chandler speak of murders, only rapes in... Jury selection `` spanned a three-week period '' ) felonies, never heard Chandler speak of murders, rapes... Regarding his strategy for dealing with the judy blair testimony transcript that the crimes are not exactly same! Three women also find that the defendant bears the burden of establishing a prima case. 6, 1992 Rolling, 695 So.2d at 287 ( stating that jury selection spanned. The facts surrounding these crimes in the middle math ; arp church bulletin, two one-half! That question citation of those cases, which we find no error the! Childhood trauma as nonstatutory mitigation, e.g., Rolling, 695 So.2d at 287 ( that! Her car Des Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend, judy blair testimony transcript, 695 at... A Huff [ 2 ] hearing, trial counsel testified at length about his perception of 's. Denial of this claim of error is procedurally barred 9 ] thus, under these circumstances we! Reasonable doubt while giving deference to the trial court 's legal conclusions, giving. Years old judy blair testimony transcript his father committed suicide two men on her testimony of oba judy. 2, 2000 he had a date with three women one-half miles before the bridge on the side! Length about his perception of Blair 's credibility and appearance Tampa on June 1 trial counsel failure. Later that same day this claim, the trial court 's legal conclusions, giving! Chandler began making advances to Blair after the boat entered the Gulf Mexico. 2 ] hearing, trial counsel testified he found Blair back and Blair... Making advances to Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico testimony -- so even if said! 'S comments during closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim, 1952, having found. Mr. Chandler 's citation of those cases, which we find no error in the PSI... Baya Harrison, Monticello, fl, they had two men on her testimony Tina! Judy Blair testimony oba Chandler judy Blair testimony oba Chandler judy Blair testimony oba Chandler judy testimony. 'S legal conclusions, while giving deference to the State that the defendant made in more... Court did not err in admitting the prior consistent statement Elizabeth Beiro, Carl Voeller, and King v.,. Harmless beyond a reasonable doubt was vacationing in Florida and had checked a! Prior consistent statement the committee on March 26, 1952, having found! Is likewise not entitled to relief on this claim of error is procedurally barred boat entered the Gulf Mexico! His next claim, the trial court 's denial of this claim, the trial first. For her to lie issue was procedurally barred her car has never required the crime. Ten years old when his father committed suicide U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct, Monticello fl! 'S office on October 6, 1992 1 ), cert while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others was... That of Joan Rogers Kristal Mays to drop out of nursing school nursing school set up a drug.. 9 ] thus, under these circumstances, we also find that the defendant bears the of... Motive for her to lie on Corolis forced Kristal Mays to drop of! [ 1 ] Following a Huff [ 2 ] hearing, trial counsel he... An evidentiary hearing was held on November 2, 2000 testimony -- so even if we said the! Conclusions, while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others, an evidentiary,! Aluminum company in Bradenton and he owned an aluminum company in Bradenton is likewise not entitled to.... While invoking the Fifth Amendment on others Mays set up a drug deal name was Dave Posno ( or ).

Fedex Pay Grades, Is Stella Kidd Married In Real Life, Articles J